Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 12, 2021

Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:18-cv-12296
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc., Judge Marrero ordered Compass to respond to Charter’s sealing request by April 14.

Who this affects

Charter Communications, Inc. and Compass Productions International LLC were affected by the order, which required Compass to respond to Charter’s request; the request also concerned public access to identified filings and exhibits.

What happened

Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. concerns Charter Communications’ request to redact and seal portions of its summary-judgment filings and exhibits. Charter said the materials contained sensitive business information and information Compass had designated confidential under a protective order.

Charter asked the court to keep specified pages, deposition testimony, and exhibits from public view. Charter argued that some of its own business information could cause competitive harm if disclosed, while it relied on Compass’s confidentiality designations for other materials. The text does not show Compass’s response or the court’s final decision on sealing.

Judge Victor Marrero ordered Compass to tell the court its position in a letter of no more than five pages by April 14, 2021. The order therefore directed a response; it did not grant or deny Charter’s sealing request in the text provided.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-12296
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Apr. 12, 2021

Background

Charter Communications, Inc. asked the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for permission to redact and file under seal portions of its memorandum supporting summary judgment, its statement of material facts, deposition transcripts, and other exhibits. Charter identified confidential programmer-carriage agreements, financial analyses, testimony describing those materials, and other sensitive business information.

Charter argued that the information should remain confidential because public disclosure could harm its competitive standing. It also asked to seal additional materials solely because Compass Productions International LLC had designated them confidential under the parties’ January 9, 2020 protective order. Charter stated that it was not offering independent arguments for sealing the materials covered only by Compass’s designations. The letter cited Second Circuit and Southern District of New York decisions concerning the public’s access to court records, competitive harm, and narrowly tailored redactions.

Court’s Action

Judge Victor Marrero did not decide the sealing request in the provided text. Instead, the court directed Compass to respond by letter, limited to five pages, stating its position on Charter’s request. The response was due April 14, 2021. The text provided does not show whether the court later granted, denied, or modified the requested redactions or sealing.

Effect

The order required Compass to submit its position before the court ruled on Charter’s request. It concerned access to filings and exhibits in the case and did not decide the underlying summary-judgment dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.