Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 12, 2021

Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:19-cv-10388
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissPro Se
In one sentence

In Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon, Judge Briccetti extended Terri Simmons’s deadline to oppose dismissal and denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Terri Simmons, who was given more time to oppose the defendants’ motion to dismiss but was denied fee-waiver status for an appeal from this order.

What happened

In Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon, the defendants moved to dismiss Terri Simmons’s amended complaint. Simmons was representing herself and had received permission to proceed without paying court fees.

Simmons’s deadline to respond was April 5, 2021, but she had not filed a response by the date of the order. The court gave her until May 10, 2021, to oppose the motion.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti ordered that the dismissal motion would be treated as fully submitted and unopposed if Simmons did not respond by May 10. The judge also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order. This order did not decide the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simmons v. City of Mount Vernon · No. 7:19-cv-10388
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
Apr. 12, 2021

Background

The defendants moved to dismiss Terri Simmons’s amended complaint on March 22, 2021. Simmons was proceeding without a lawyer and without paying court fees. Her deadline to oppose the motion was April 5, 2021, but she had not filed an opposition by the time of this order.

Order

The court extended Simmons’s deadline to oppose the motion to dismiss until May 10, 2021. The court stated that, if Simmons did not respond by that date, the motion would be treated as fully submitted and unopposed and would be decided later. If Simmons filed an opposition, the defendants’ reply, if any, would be due May 17, 2021.

Appeal Status and Effect

The court certified that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Simmons permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order did not decide the merits of the defendants’ motion to dismiss or dismiss the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.