Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2021

Dorsey v. Royce

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-03126
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Dorsey v. Royce, Judge Swain ordered Leroy J. Dorsey to correct filing paperwork before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Leroy J. Dorsey and the further processing of his action; the order required him to correct filing documents before the case could proceed.

What happened

In Dorsey v. Royce, Leroy J. Dorsey, who is incarcerated and representing himself, asked to proceed without paying the filing fees upfront. His prisoner authorization did not state the amount to be collected from his prison account, and his complaint was unsigned.

The court gave Dorsey 30 days to either pay the required fees or submit a completed prisoner authorization, and to submit an original signature page for his complaint. The court said the case would be dismissed if he did not comply, and that no summons would issue at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk to mail the order to Dorsey and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from this order. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dorsey v. Royce · No. 1:21-cv-03126
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 14, 2021

Background

Leroy J. Dorsey, who was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, brought the action without a lawyer and asked to proceed without paying filing fees upfront. The opinion states that he submitted an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and a prisoner authorization, but the authorization did not specify the amount to be collected from his prison account. He also submitted a complaint without a signature.

Court’s Requirements

The court explained that a prisoner seeking to proceed without prepaying fees must submit a signed application and a prisoner authorization. The authorization permits collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account and requires the facility to send the court certified copies of the prisoner’s account statements for the previous six months. The court directed Dorsey, within 30 days of the order, either to pay $402 in fees or to complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with the docket number 21-CV-3126 (CM).

The court also directed Dorsey to submit an original signature page for the complaint within 30 days. The order stated that the Clerk would mail a copy to Dorsey and note service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. If Dorsey complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain did not address the merits of Dorsey’s claims. The order directed him to correct the prisoner-authorization and signature deficiencies, warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal, and certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal from this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.