Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2021

Silverstein v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Paul Davison
Docket
7:21-cv-03207
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Silverstein v. Commissioner, Judge Swain ordered payment of the filing fees or an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Jolie D. Silverstein, who must either pay the required fees or submit an application to proceed without paying them in advance within 30 days.

What happened

Jolie D. Silverstein sued the Commissioner of Social Security and submitted a complaint with a $400 personal check. The court explained that filing the case required $402 in fees or a signed application to proceed without paying them in advance.

The court directed the clerk to return Silverstein’s personal check. It also ordered Silverstein, within 30 days, to pay $402 by certified check or money order or submit the attached application.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that no summons issue yet and said the case would be processed if Silverstein complied; otherwise, the action would be dismissed. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Silverstein v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 7:21-cv-03207
Judge
Paul Davison
Date
Apr. 14, 2021

Background

Jolie D. Silverstein brought this action without a lawyer. The opinion states that a civil action in the Southern District of New York requires $402 in fees: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. A plaintiff who seeks to proceed without paying those fees in advance must submit a signed application for that status, commonly called an IFP application.

Silverstein submitted her complaint with a $400 personal check. The opinion explains that the administrative fee had increased from $50 to $52, making the total required fee $402.

Order

The court directed Silverstein, within 30 days of the order, either to pay $402 by certified check or money order payable to the Clerk of Court or to submit the attached IFP application. If the court grants the application, Silverstein may proceed without paying the fees in advance.

The court directed the Cashiers Unit to return the $400 personal check to Silverstein and directed the Clerk of Court to mail her a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order states that, if Silverstein complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if she does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.