Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 14, 2021

Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:18-cv-12296
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
6
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Compass Productions v. Charter Communications: Judge Marrero granted Charter’s request to redact or seal listed summary-judgment materials.

Who this affects

Charter Communications and Compass Productions International LLC, as well as public access to the listed court materials.

What happened

Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. involved Charter Communications’ request to keep certain materials from the public docket. The materials supported Charter’s motion for summary judgment and included business agreements, financial analyses, testimony, and exhibits.

Charter argued that some materials contained confidential business information whose disclosure could cause competitive harm. Charter also asked to seal materials that Compass had marked confidential under the parties’ protective order.

Judge Victor Marrero granted Charter’s request to redact or seal the listed materials. The provided text does not show a ruling on the underlying summary-judgment motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Compass Productions International LLC v. Charter Communications, Inc. · No. 1:18-cv-12296
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Apr. 14, 2021

Background

Charter Communications asked the court for permission to redact or file under seal portions of its summary-judgment memorandum, statement of material facts, deposition transcripts, and other exhibits. Charter identified confidential programmer-carriage agreements, financial analyses, testimony about those materials, and other sensitive business information.

Charter also asked to seal materials that Compass Productions International LLC had designated confidential under the parties’ January 9, 2020 protective order. Charter stated that it did not offer separate arguments supporting the continued sealing of Compass’s confidential information, apart from respecting Compass’s confidentiality designations.

Arguments and legal standard

Charter relied on the presumption that federal court documents should generally be available to the public and on exceptions allowing protection of legitimate privacy interests. It argued that the requested redactions and sealing were narrowly tailored and necessary to prevent competitive harm from disclosure of confidential commercial information. Charter also argued that some of the information was irrelevant to the case.

Ruling

The court granted Charter’s request to redact or seal the materials listed in the request. The order does not separately specify which listed materials were redacted and which were filed under seal. The provided text contains no ruling on the merits of Charter’s summary-judgment motion or on the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.