Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 13, 2021

Rosado v. Castillo

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:20-cv-03913
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rosado v. Castillo, Judge Liman ordered a hearing to review the parties’ proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, Arlene Rosado and Carlos Rosado, and the defendants named in the case were required to participate in the scheduled settlement approval hearing.

What happened

Arlene Rosado and Carlos Rosado sued Ignacio Castillo and the other defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle.

Because Second Circuit law requires court review of Fair Labor Standards Act settlements, including proposed attorney’s fees, the court required a settlement approval hearing. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or approve it.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered the parties to appear by telephone on April 23, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. He also directed the plaintiffs to attend and, if necessary, use an interpreter.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rosado v. Castillo · No. 1:20-cv-03913
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Apr. 13, 2021

Background

The plaintiffs brought the case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing certain wage and hour rights. The parties reported that they had reached a settlement in principle.

Court’s analysis

The court stated that, under then-current Second Circuit law, any Fair Labor Standards Act settlement must be reviewed to ensure that it is fair. That review includes any proposed award of attorney’s fees. The opinion does not provide the settlement terms and does not make a fairness determination.

Order and effect

The court directed the parties to appear by telephone for a settlement approval hearing on April 23, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. The plaintiffs were directed to attend and, if necessary, to appear with an interpreter. The order does not state that the settlement was approved or that the case was dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.