Clarkson Recovery Corp. v. Ryzinski
- Vyskocil
- 1:20-cv-04336
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Clarkson Recovery Corp. v. Ryzinski, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by May 19, 2021.
Clarkson Recovery Corp., Bolek Ryzinski, and Lukas Macniak; the action was discontinued subject to the court’s restoration deadline.
What happened
In Clarkson Recovery Corp. v. Ryzinski, Clarkson Recovery Corp. informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and allowed it to be restored if an application was made by May 19, 2021. If no application was made by then, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the pending letter motion.
The detailed version
- Clarkson Recovery Corp. v. Ryzinski · No. 1:20-cv-04336
- Vyskocil
- Apr. 19, 2021
Background
Clarkson Recovery Corp. told the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by May 19, 2021. The order states that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice, meaning the action could not be restored. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the letter motion at docket entry 37.
Effect
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil’s order ended the action subject to the stated restoration deadline. The opinion does not decide the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.