Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:18-cv-11386
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company, Judge Parker granted GE’s request to file a discovery motion under seal.
General Electric Company and the other defendants were permitted to file the specified motion under seal; the ruling concerned confidential material from Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited’s document-review letter.
What happened
Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company concerns General Electric Company’s request for permission to file a motion to compel under seal and with redactions.
GE said the motion quoted a letter from Spectrum Dynamics describing its document-review process. Spectrum had marked the entire letter as highly confidential, and GE sought sealing to protect potentially sensitive business information.
Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application, allowing GE to file the motion to compel under seal. The document did not decide the underlying discovery dispute.
The detailed version
- Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company · No. 1:18-cv-11386
- Vernon Broderick
- Apr. 21, 2021
Background
General Electric Company asked the court for permission to file under seal and with redactions a letter motion seeking to compel Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited to properly review, designate, and produce relevant documents, and seeking costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. GE made the request under Rule 5.2(e), Judge Parker’s individual practice rules, and the parties’ stipulated confidentiality and protective order.
GE stated that it did not believe the motion contained highly confidential information. It nevertheless said the motion described and quoted from a letter Spectrum had filed on April 14, 2021, concerning Spectrum’s document-review process. Spectrum had designated the entire letter as highly confidential. GE therefore sought permission to file the motion under seal as a precaution.
Legal Standard
The letter explained that the presumption of public access to judicial documents may be overcome when confidentiality protects important interests, including protection against competitive harm. Courts may permit sealing or redaction of competitively sensitive proprietary business information.
Ruling
Judge Katharine H. Parker granted the application. The ruling allowed GE to file its motion to compel under seal. It did not resolve the motion to compel, the parties’ discovery dispute, or the request for costs.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.