Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 23, 2021

Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:20-cv-05937
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureEmployment
In one sentence

In Lee v. Grove Group Advisors, Judge Carter granted a stay so the parties could complete a settlement and submit it for court review.

Who this affects

Lee, Grove Group Advisors LLC, the other parties to the case, and the parties’ existing case deadlines.

What happened

In Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC, the parties told the court they had reached a settlement in principle, subject to signing a written agreement. Lee asked the court to pause all current deadlines while the parties completed that agreement.

The court granted the request to stay the case. It directed the parties to submit their proposed settlement and a joint memorandum explaining why the settlement is fair and reasonable and addressing concerns identified in a cited case. The provided text does not show the rest of the deadline after the words “within 60.”

Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. entered the order. The order did not dismiss the case or approve the settlement in the provided text.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lee v. Grove Group Advisors LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05937
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Apr. 23, 2021

Background

Lee, the plaintiff, informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle, subject to completing a written agreement. Lee requested that the court stay, or pause, all current deadlines indefinitely so the parties could formalize the agreement and later file a joint dismissal with prejudice and materials for the court’s review.

Court’s Action

The court granted the request to stay the case. It directed the parties to file the proposed settlement and a joint memorandum of no more than 10 pages explaining why the settlement is fair and reasonable and addressing the concerns identified in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. The provided opinion text states that the materials must be filed “within 60” but is cut off before the remainder of the deadline appears.

Disposition and Effect

The order granted the stay request. It did not, in the provided text, approve the settlement or dismiss the case. Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. also did not impose a dismissal with prejudice in this order; Lee’s letter described that as a later filing the parties intended to submit after completing the written settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.