Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2021

Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Docket
1:19-cv-06990
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security, Magistrate Judge Lehrburger awarded $25,391.25 in attorney’s fees and ordered counsel to remit $7,374.80 to Thomas.

Who this affects

Wade Thomas and his counsel were affected: the court awarded $25,391.25 in attorney’s fees and ordered counsel to remit $7,374.80 to Thomas.

What happened

In Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security, Wade Thomas asked the court to award attorney’s fees in connection with his Social Security case.

The court considered Thomas’s motion, the parties’ written arguments, and their other arguments. It found that the request was filed on time and was reasonable.

Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger awarded $25,391.25 in attorney’s fees and directed Thomas’s counsel to remit $7,374.80 to Thomas.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:19-cv-06990
Judge
Robert Lehrburger
Date
May 4, 2021

What the Motion Asked For

Wade Thomas moved for an award of attorney’s fees in his Social Security case against Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security.

Court’s Analysis

The court considered Thomas’s motion, the parties’ briefs, and their arguments. It found that Thomas’s request was timely, meaning it was filed within the applicable deadline, and reasonable.

Outcome

The court awarded $25,391.25 in attorney’s fees. It also directed Thomas’s counsel to remit $7,374.80 to Thomas, citing Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002). The order addressed the fee request and did not discuss the underlying Social Security claim.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.