Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 7, 2021

Latin American Music Company, Inc. v. Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.

Judge
Richard Sullivan
Docket
1:13-cv-01526
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Latin American Music v. Spanish Broadcasting, Judge Sullivan granted SBS permission to register its fee judgment against LAMCO and ACEMLA in Puerto Rico.

Who this affects

The order affects Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc., which may register and pursue enforcement of its existing fee judgment in the District of Puerto Rico, and LAMCO and ACEMLA, which are jointly and individually liable under that judgment. The judgment also directs payment of the remaining amount to non-party indemnitor Broadcast Music, Inc.

What happened

Latin American Music Company, Inc. v. Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. concerned Spanish Broadcasting System’s request to register a prior judgment in Puerto Rico while Latin American Music Company and Asociación de Compositores y Editores de Música Latinoamericana’s appeal was pending.

The earlier judgment required the plaintiffs to pay $845,040.95 in attorneys’ fees and costs, including $503,393.05 to Spanish Broadcasting. Spanish Broadcasting showed that the plaintiffs had no real or personal property found in New York but had assets in Puerto Rico. The plaintiffs did not oppose the request or provide evidence against it.

Judge Sullivan granted Spanish Broadcasting’s motion and directed the Clerk to issue a certified copy of the judgment for filing in Puerto Rico. The order did not revisit the underlying fee judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Latin American Music Company, Inc. v. Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. · No. 1:13-cv-01526
Judge
Richard Sullivan
Date
May 7, 2021

Background

On July 17, 2020, the court entered a judgment holding Latin American Music Company, Inc. (LAMCO) and Asociación de Compositores y Editores de Música Latinoamericana de Puerto Rico, Inc. (ACEMLA) jointly and individually responsible for $845,040.95 in attorneys’ fees and costs. The judgment directed the plaintiffs to pay $503,393.05 to Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (SBS), with the balance payable to non-party indemnitor Broadcast Music, Inc.

The plaintiffs appealed the judgment but had not posted a bond or requested a stay preventing enforcement. On January 15, 2021, SBS moved under 28 U.S.C. § 1963 to register the judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico while the appeal was pending. Registration allows a judgment entered in one federal district to be filed and enforced in another district when the judgment is final on appeal or when the issuing court orders registration for good cause.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that good cause may be shown when the judgment debtor has substantial property in the other district and insufficient property in the district that issued the judgment. Exact proof of the debtor’s assets is not required; affidavits and other documents may be enough.

SBS submitted a public-records search showing no real or personal property owned by the plaintiffs in New York. It also submitted the plaintiffs’ sworn declarations from bankruptcy filings in Puerto Rico, which showed that the plaintiffs had assets there. The plaintiffs did not object, submit contrary evidence, or provide a substantial reason against registration.

Disposition

The court held that SBS had established good cause and granted SBS’s motion to register the judgment in the District of Puerto Rico. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the motion at Document Number 232 and issue a certified copy of the judgment for filing in Puerto Rico. The order addressed registration of the existing judgment; it did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute or alter the judgment’s stated amounts.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.