Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 13, 2021

Owens v. Keyser

Docket
1:18-cv-11638
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Owens v. Keyser, the court denied Owens’s habeas petition and denied him fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Ricky Owens’s federal habeas petition was denied, and he was denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. William Keyser was the respondent.

What happened

In Owens v. Keyser, the court adopted the report and recommendation in full and denied Ricky Owens’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under federal law.

The judgment also stated that any appeal would not be taken in good faith, so the court denied Owens permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The case was closed.

The judgment was entered on May 13, 2021, by the court; the provided text does not identify the deciding judge by name.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Owens v. Keyser · No. 1:18-cv-11638
Date
May 13, 2021

Ruling

The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety and denied Ricky Owens’s application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The provided judgment does not state whether the denial rested on the merits of Owens’s claims or on a procedural ground.

Appeal-fee ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Owens permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment stated that the case was closed.

Disposition

The habeas petition was denied, permission to appeal without paying filing fees was denied, and the case was closed. The provided text is a judgment that refers to a separate May 13, 2021 order and adopted report and recommendation; it does not include the reasoning needed to determine whether the habeas ruling was a merits decision.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.