Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 17, 2021

Vale S.A. v. BSG Resources Limited

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-03619
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Vale v. BSG Resources, Judge Broderick granted Vale’s request to file specified motion papers and exhibits under seal because they contained sensitive or confidential information.

Who this affects

Vale S.A., the parties and non-parties whose confidential or sensitive information appeared in the materials, and members of the public seeking access to those court filings.

What happened

In Vale S.A. v. BSG Resources Limited, Vale asked for permission to redact and file under seal papers supporting its motion to compel compliance with discovery requests served on Benjamin (Beny) Steinmetz as BSGR’s alter ego.

Vale said the papers contained sensitive or personal information and information designated confidential by parties that had produced it in separate proceedings. Vale also said the parties had agreed that the materials could be used in this case if they remained under seal.

The court granted Vale’s application. Judge Vernon S. Broderick therefore allowed Vale to file the specified memorandum, declaration, and Exhibits A through D under seal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Vale S.A. v. BSG Resources Limited · No. 1:19-cv-03619
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
May 17, 2021

Background

Vale S.A. submitted a letter motion asking permission to redact highlighted portions of, and file under seal, its memorandum supporting a motion to compel compliance with discovery requests served on Benjamin (Beny) Steinmetz as the alter ego of BSG Resources Limited. Vale also sought to seal the supporting declaration of Lisa Vicens and Exhibits A through D.

Arguments and Materials

Vale stated that the filing materials relied on documents and information containing potentially sensitive or personal information, as well as information designated confidential by parties that had produced it in separate proceedings. Vale referred to the need to balance the public’s right of access to court documents against privacy and confidentiality interests. It also stated that a protective order in a related proceeding allowed Vale to use certain confidential materials in connection with its motion if the materials were filed under seal and continued to receive confidential treatment. Vale said the parties had met and conferred and agreed that the documents could be used on that condition.

Ruling

The court’s order states: “APPLICATION GRANTED.” Judge Vernon S. Broderick granted Vale’s application to file the specified memorandum, declaration, and exhibits under seal. The opinion text does not provide a separate written explanation of the judge’s reasoning beyond the granted application and Vale’s supporting letter.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.