Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 20, 2021

Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:21-cv-04217
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiffs to choose whether to amend their complaint before defendants’ dismissal motion proceeds.

Who this affects

Dorothy Barnes and Linda McNair, their counsel, and the City of Mount Vernon, the City of Mount Vernon Police Department, and the individual defendants.

What happened

Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon involves plaintiffs Dorothy Barnes and Linda McNair and defendants including the City of Mount Vernon, its Police Department, and individual officers and detectives.

The defendants had moved to dismiss the complaint on May 18, 2021. The court ordered the plaintiffs to notify the court by May 28 whether they would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint.

If the plaintiffs chose to amend, Judge Vincent L. Briccetti required them to file the amended complaint within 14 days after their notice. The order did not decide the motion to dismiss.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Barnes v. City of Mount Vernon · No. 7:21-cv-04217
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
May 20, 2021

Background

The plaintiffs are Dorothy Barnes and Linda McNair. The defendants are the City of Mount Vernon, the City of Mount Vernon Police Department, several police officers, and several detectives. The opinion states that the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on May 18, 2021.

Order

The court ordered the plaintiffs to notify the court by May 28, 2021, whether they intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion to dismiss or would rely on the existing complaint. If the plaintiffs chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the regular schedule. The court also stated that it was unlikely to give the plaintiffs another opportunity to amend based on deficiencies revealed by the fully briefed motion.

If the plaintiffs chose to amend, they had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, the defendants could answer, move to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that they would rely on the original motion to dismiss.

Additional Deadlines and Effect

Defense counsel had to serve the order on plaintiffs’ counsel by May 21, 2021. Plaintiffs’ counsel had to file a notice of appearance on the electronic docket by May 26, 2021. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss and did not decide the merits of the claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.