Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 24, 2021

Evans v. Absolute Results

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-00280
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Evans v. Absolute Results, Judge Schofield ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant; the discrimination claims remain undecided.

Who this affects

Dallas X. Evans and Absolute Results; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to arrange service of the lawsuit.

What happened

In Evans v. Absolute Results, Dallas X. Evans, representing himself, alleges that his employer discriminated against him because of his race under federal employment-discrimination laws.

The court had allowed Evans to proceed without paying filing fees. Because he could not arrange service himself before the court reviewed the amended complaint, the court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered the Clerk of Court to prepare the service paperwork, issue a summons, and send the materials to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on Absolute Results. The order did not decide whether Evans’s discrimination allegations are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Evans v. Absolute Results · No. 1:21-cv-00280
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
May 24, 2021

Background Dallas X. Evans brings this self-represented action against Absolute Results under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. He alleges that his employer discriminated against him because of his race. The court had previously granted Evans permission to proceed without paying filing fees, known as proceeding in forma pauperis.

Service of Process Because Evans was proceeding without paying filing fees, he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court explained that Evans could not have served the summons and amended complaint until the court reviewed the amended complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The court therefore extended the time for service until 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, the opinion states that Evans should request an extension of time.

Ruling The court ordered the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for Absolute Results at the address listed in the order, issue a summons, provide the Marshals Service with the necessary paperwork, and mail Evans an information package and a copy of the order. The court also ordered Evans to notify the court in writing if his address changes and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so. This order addressed service of process and did not decide the merits of Evans’s discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.