Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2021

Fertides v. Beaudouin

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-04714
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fertides v. Beaudouin, Judge Swain ordered payment or an application to proceed without prepaying fees, warning of dismissal for noncompliance.

Who this affects

Yasmil Fertides and the civil action against Dr. Robert Beaudouin and the other named defendants; the order also directs the Clerk of Court and, if applicable, Fertides’s correctional facility to take specified administrative and payment-related actions.

What happened

In Fertides v. Beaudouin, Yasmil Fertides filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the paperwork needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that Fertides was being held at the federal Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, New York, and was representing himself.

The court gave Fertides 30 days to either pay $402 or submit a signed application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison trust-fund account and require submission of account statements for the prior six months.

Judge Swain ordered the Clerk to mail the order to Fertides and said no summons would issue at that time. The action would be processed if Fertides complied, but it would be dismissed if he did not. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal from the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fertides v. Beaudouin · No. 1:21-cv-04714
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
May 27, 2021

Background

Yasmil Fertides brought this civil action without a lawyer. The order states that Fertides was being held at the federal Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York, New York. Fertides submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without completing an application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fees and required filings

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees. If that request is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prison trust-fund account. The prisoner authorization directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and to provide certified account statements for the previous six months. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Court’s order

The court ordered Fertides, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 in fees or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization. The filings were to identify docket number 1:21-CV-4714. The Clerk was directed to mail Fertides a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time.

If Fertides complied, the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If Fertides failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order cautioned that certain dismissals of prisoner cases can count as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.