Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 26, 2021

Rivas v. Frank Brusco Maintenance, LLC

Judge
Sarah Netburn
Docket
1:20-cv-08135
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rivas v. Frank Brusco Maintenance, LLC, Judge Woods scheduled a conference on defense counsel’s withdrawal motion and ordered two defendants to attend.

Who this affects

Frank Brusco, Sr., Frank Brusco, Jr., their defense counsel, and people appearing at the Southern District of New York courthouse.

What happened

In Rivas v. Frank Brusco Maintenance, LLC, defense counsel Michael K. Chong, LLC moved to withdraw as counsel for the defendants on May 25, 2021.

The court scheduled a June 2, 2021 conference about that motion and ordered Frank Brusco, Sr. and Frank Brusco, Jr. to participate. Defense counsel had to confirm their attendance to the court by May 28 and serve the order on the defendants.

Judge Gregory H. Woods also required people attending the courthouse to follow pandemic-entry procedures, including completing a questionnaire and having their temperature taken. The order did not decide the motion to withdraw.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rivas v. Frank Brusco Maintenance, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-08135
Judge
Sarah Netburn
Date
May 26, 2021

Background

The opinion is an order concerning Michael K. Chong, LLC’s May 25, 2021 motion to withdraw as counsel of record for the defendants. The order does not state that the court ruled on whether counsel could withdraw.

Court’s Action

The court scheduled a conference for June 2, 2021, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 12C of the Southern District of New York. Frank Brusco, Sr. and Frank Brusco, Jr. were ordered to participate. Defense counsel was directed to write to the court by May 28, 2021, confirming that those defendants would attend. Counsel was also directed to serve the order on the defendants and retain proof of service.

Courthouse Requirements

The order stated that, because of the ongoing novel coronavirus pandemic, people appearing at the courthouse had to follow courthouse safety protocols. These included completing a questionnaire and having their temperature taken. The attached instructions stated that people who did not meet the entry requirements would not be permitted to enter.

Disposition

The court scheduled the conference and issued the related participation, confirmation, service, and courthouse-entry directives. Judge Gregory H. Woods did not decide the withdrawal motion in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.