Klein v. Koenig
- Philip Halpern
- 7:20-cv-09319
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Klein v. Koenig, Judge Halpern dismissed Benjamin Klein’s action without prejudice after he failed to file an amended complaint.
Benjamin Klein’s case was dismissed without prejudice, and the action was terminated. The opinion does not decide the merits of his claims against Shlomo Koenig and the other defendants.
What happened
In Klein v. Koenig, Benjamin Klein alleged that Shlomo Koenig and others violated his constitutional rights. The court had dismissed his original complaint for failing to state a claim but allowed him 30 days to file an amended complaint. After the court extended that deadline because it could not confirm Klein received the earlier order, Klein still did not file an amended complaint.
Klein told the court that he had filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and believed the bankruptcy filing paused this case. The court rejected that position because the bankruptcy pause applies to actions against the person who filed for bankruptcy, while Klein was pursuing claims against other people.
Judge Halpern dismissed the action without prejudice for failing to move the case forward under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the action.
The detailed version
- Klein v. Koenig · No. 7:20-cv-09319
- Philip Halpern
- May 27, 2021
Background
Benjamin Klein filed a complaint against Shlomo Koenig and others on November 6, 2020, alleging violations of his constitutional rights. On February 2, 2021, the court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim, meaning the court found that the complaint did not adequately allege a legally actionable claim. The dismissal was without prejudice, and the court allowed Klein 30 days to file an amended complaint.
The court later observed that the docket did not show that the February 2 order had been mailed to Klein and that it could not otherwise determine whether he had received it. On March 31, 2021, the court extended Klein’s time to file an amended complaint by another 30 days and stated that the action would be terminated if he did not file one by May 3, 2021. Klein did not file an amended complaint.
Bankruptcy Filing
Klein sent the court a letter dated April 16, 2021, stating that he had filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy and asserting that the bankruptcy filing paused this case. The court rejected that argument. It explained that the automatic pause under 11 U.S.C. § 362 applies to actions proceeding against the person who filed for bankruptcy. Here, Klein was the person pursuing claims against other parties.
Ruling
The court relied on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which permits a judge to dismiss a case when a plaintiff fails to prosecute, or fails to move the case forward. The court ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the action and to mail Klein copies of the dismissal order and the two earlier orders.
The opinion does not decide whether Klein’s constitutional-rights allegations were valid. It dismisses the action because Klein did not file the required amended complaint.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.