Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 27, 2021

1265 Broadway LLC v. Oakwood Worldwide LP

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-04636
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In 1265 Broadway LLC v. Oakwood Worldwide, Judge Schofield summarily remanded the case because defendants’ removal notice lacked required citizenship allegations.

Who this affects

1265 Broadway LLC and defendants Oakwood Worldwide (US) LP and Worldwide Corporate Housing, L.P.; the case was returned to state court.

What happened

1265 Broadway LLC sued Oakwood Worldwide (US) LP and Worldwide Corporate Housing, L.P.; the defendants removed the case from state court to federal court on May 27, 2021.

The court found the removal notice procedurally defective because it did not adequately allege the defendants’ citizenship, the principal places of business of certain partner entities, or the citizenship of the entities’ members and partners. The court explained that diversity must exist when the state case began and when removal occurs, and that an entity’s citizenship depends on the citizenship of all its members.

The court summarily remanded the matter to state court, directed the clerk to send the order to the New York Supreme Court in New York County, and closed the federal case. Judge Lorna G. Schofield issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
1265 Broadway LLC v. Oakwood Worldwide LP · No. 1:21-cv-04636
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
May 27, 2021

Background

Defendants Oakwood Worldwide (US) LP and Worldwide Corporate Housing, L.P. filed a notice of removal on May 27, 2021. The opinion identifies 1265 Broadway LLC as the plaintiff.

Defect in the Removal Notice

The court found that the notice of removal did not allege several facts needed to establish diversity jurisdiction. Specifically, it did not allege:

- the defendants’ citizenship when the state-court action began; - the principal places of business of Pine SR (US) LLC and Pine G.P. (US) LLC, identified as partners of Oakwood Worldwide (US) LP; - the principal places of business of Oakwood Worldwide (US) LP and Worldwide Corporate Housing GP Holdings, LLC, identified as partners of Worldwide Corporate Housing, L.P.; or - the citizenship, rather than merely the residency, of the members and partners of the relevant entities.

The court stated that when diversity is the sole basis for removal, diversity must exist both when the original action is filed in state court and when removal is sought. It also stated that the citizenship of a limited liability company or limited partnership depends on the citizenship of all its members, and that citizenship for diversity purposes depends on domicile rather than residence alone.

Ruling

The court held that the defendants’ notice of removal was procedurally defective and ordered that the matter be summarily remanded to state court. Under the cited statute, the clerk was directed to mail a certified copy of the opinion and order to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County. The clerk was also directed to close the federal case. Judge Lorna G. Schofield did not decide the underlying dispute’s merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.