Mancilla v. All American Laundry Service, Inc.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:20-cv-10255
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Mancilla v. All American Laundry Service, Judge Schofield ordered settlement papers and fairness evidence, while canceling pending conferences and deadlines.
The parties and their counsel were required to submit the settlement and supporting materials; pending conferences and deadlines in the case were canceled.
What happened
In Mancilla v. All American Laundry Service, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered the parties to file the settlement and a joint letter with evidence supporting findings that the settlement was fair and reasonable. If counsel sought payment for fees and expenses, the letter also had to include a detailed breakdown of counsel’s time and expenses. The court canceled pending conferences and deadlines.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield set June 22, 2021, as the filing deadline. The order did not approve the settlement itself.
The detailed version
- Mancilla v. All American Laundry Service, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-10255
- Lorna Schofield
- June 2, 2021
Background
The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The order does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Order
The court ordered the parties to file two items by June 22, 2021: (1) the settlement and (2) a joint letter with supporting evidence addressing the findings required for the court to determine whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. The court cited decisions discussing judicial review of settlements.
The court further ordered that, if counsel sought attorneys’ fees and expenses, the parties’ letter must include a detailed breakdown of counsel’s time and expenses. It also ordered that any pending conferences and deadlines were canceled.
Disposition
The order required additional settlement-approval materials but did not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement. It also canceled pending conferences and deadlines.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.