Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2021

Baltic Fourth LLC v. Stern

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:21-cv-04829
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Baltic Fourth LLC v. Stern, Judge Gardephe referred the case to bankruptcy court and administratively closed it without deciding the underlying claims.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs, defendants, and nominal defendants in the case are affected because the matter was referred to bankruptcy court and administratively closed in the district court. The order does not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

What happened

In Baltic Fourth LLC v. Stern, the district court referred the case to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The case involved Baltic Fourth LLC, Tona Construction & Management LLC, Michael Stern, JDS Fourth Avenue LLC, JDS Construction Group LLC, and two nominal defendants.

The referral was made under a standing order concerning bankruptcy-related matters. The court stated that the case could later be transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, where a related bankruptcy case was pending. The opinion did not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe directed the Clerk of Court to make the referral and administratively closed the matter in the district court. The order made the referral without prejudice to a possible transfer to the Delaware bankruptcy court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baltic Fourth LLC v. Stern · No. 1:21-cv-04829
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
June 3, 2021

Background

Baltic Fourth LLC and Tona Construction & Management LLC brought the case against Michael Stern, JDS Fourth Avenue LLC, and JDS Construction Group LLC. Fourth Avenue JV LLC and Fourth Avenue Property Owner LLC were named as nominal defendants. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Court’s Action

Pursuant to the Amended Standing Order of Reference of Chief Judge Loretta A. Preska, the court referred the matter to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The order stated that the referral was without prejudice to transfer to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, where a bankruptcy case identified as Case No. 21-10888 was pending.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to refer the case to the Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court and administratively closed the matter in the district court. The order did not reach or decide the underlying claims.

Disposition

The case was referred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, without prejudice to a possible transfer to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, and was administratively closed in the district court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.