Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2021

Rosario v. 251 E. 123rd St. Realty, LLC

Judge
Jed Rakoff
Docket
1:20-cv-07387
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rosario v. 251 E. 123rd St. Realty, LLC, Judge Freeman set deadlines for deciding attorneys’ fees and costs after Judge Rakoff granted summary judgment.

Who this affects

Manuel de Jesus Rosario, who must submit documentation supporting his requested attorneys’ fees and costs, and Jose Palma, Jose Palma, Jr., and The Jose Palma Irrevocable Trust, who may respond and request a hearing.

What happened

In Rosario v. 251 E. 123rd St. Realty, LLC, Judge Jed S. Rakoff had granted summary judgment for Manuel de Jesus Rosario and referred the case for an inquest—an examination of the amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to award against Jose Palma, Jose Palma, Jr., and The Jose Palma Irrevocable Trust.

Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman ordered Rosario to serve and file a fee application by July 6, 2021. The application had to include time records, information supporting the lawyers’ and staff members’ hourly rates, and invoices or other documents supporting the claimed costs. The defendants could respond by August 5, 2021.

The court ordered that, if the defendants did not respond, it would prepare a recommendation about attorneys’ fees based only on Rosario’s written submission. The court also said it would hold a hearing only if the defendants requested one in writing by August 5. Judge Rakoff’s earlier summary-judgment ruling was not reconsidered in this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rosario v. 251 E. 123rd St. Realty, LLC · No. 1:20-cv-07387
Judge
Jed Rakoff
Date
June 4, 2021

Background

The order states that Judge Jed S. Rakoff granted summary judgment in Manuel de Jesus Rosario’s favor on May 27, 2021. On the same date, Judge Rakoff referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman to conduct an inquest into the amount of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs that should be awarded against Jose Palma, Jose Palma, Jr., and The Jose Palma Irrevocable Trust.

Required Fee Submission

The court ordered Rosario to serve the defendants and file a fee application by July 6, 2021. The application had to detail the attorneys’ fees and costs sought and include:

- The attorneys’ contemporaneous time records, so the court could assess whether the requested fees were reasonable; - Information addressing whether the hourly rates for the attorneys and support staff were reasonable; and - Invoices or other documentation supporting the costs incurred.

Response and Hearing

The defendants could file a response by August 5, 2021. If they did not respond by that date, the court stated that it would prepare a report and recommendation concerning attorneys’ fees based only on Rosario’s written submission. The court also stated that it would not hold a hearing unless the defendants requested one in writing by August 5, 2021.

Disposition

Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman entered a scheduling order governing the attorneys’ fees and costs inquest. The order did not determine the amount of fees or costs to be awarded. It also did not alter Judge Rakoff’s earlier summary-judgment ruling.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.