Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2021

Young v. L'oreal USA, Inc.

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-00446
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Motion to DismissCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Young v. L'oreal USA, Judge Woods adopted the report and recommendation, granted L'oreal's motion to dismiss, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Renee Young and Roxane Tierney, and L'oreal USA, Inc.; the dismissal closed the case.

What happened

Renee Young and Roxane Tierney sued L'oreal USA, Inc., individually and on behalf of others similarly situated. The opinion does not explain the claims or the facts behind the lawsuit.

The court reviewed a report and recommendation for clear error and found none. It accepted and adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.

Judge Gregory Woods's court granted L'oreal USA, Inc.'s motion to dismiss, and the case was closed. The opinion does not state the specific grounds for dismissal or use the terms "with prejudice" or "without prejudice."

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Young v. L'oreal USA, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-00446
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
June 4, 2021

Background

Renee Young and Roxane Tierney brought the case individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against L'oreal USA, Inc. The provided judgment does not describe the claims, the underlying facts, or the parties' arguments.

Court’s review

The court reviewed a report and recommendation under the clear-error standard. That means the court checked whether an obvious mistake appeared in the record. The court found no clear error and accepted and adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety.

Ruling

The court granted L'oreal USA, Inc.'s motion to dismiss and closed the case. The judgment does not state the specific basis for dismissal and does not say whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice. Judge Gregory Woods is identified in the case information supplied with the opinion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.