Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 7, 2021

Leon v. Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, LLC

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:19-cv-00935
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Leon v. Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, Judge Aaron preliminarily approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement, pending a fully signed agreement.

Who this affects

The ruling affects Emilio Leon and Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, LLC by preliminarily approving their proposed settlement of Fair Labor Standards Act claims while requiring a fully executed agreement for final approval.

What happened

Leon v. Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, LLC involves claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. On May 21, 2021, the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle.

Emilio Leon then asked the court to approve the settlement and submitted a settlement agreement that he had signed. The case had been referred to the court for disposition with the parties’ consent.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron found the proposed settlement fair and reasonable and preliminarily approved it. Final approval must await a fully executed settlement agreement, which the parties were required to submit by June 21, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Leon v. Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-00935
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
June 7, 2021

Background

Emilio Leon brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act against Mr. Hudson's Cleaning Service, LLC. On May 21, 2021, the parties notified the court that they had reached a settlement in principle. The parties then consented to having Stewart D. Aaron, a United States magistrate judge, dispose of the matter under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Settlement Motion

Leon filed a motion asking the court to approve the settlement and submitted a copy of the settlement agreement bearing his signature. The court reviewed the proposed settlement under the standard described in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).

Ruling

The court found that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable and preliminarily approved it. This was not final approval: the court stated that final approval must await submission of a fully executed settlement agreement. The parties were directed to submit that agreement no later than June 21, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.