Schulte v. United States of America
- Jesse Furman
- 1:21-cv-05061
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Schulte v. United States of America, Judge Swain ordered the incarcerated plaintiff to pay fees or submit forms to proceed.
Joshua Adam Schulte, an incarcerated plaintiff representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the specified forms within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Schulte v. United States of America, Joshua Adam Schulte filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting completed forms to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that he is incarcerated and representing himself.
The court gave Schulte 30 days to either pay $402 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and authorization for installment payments from his account. No summons will issue at this time, and the action will be dismissed if he does not comply.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also stated that an appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Schulte v. United States of America · No. 1:21-cv-05061
- Jesse Furman
- June 9, 2021
Background
Joshua Adam Schulte filed this civil action without paying the filing and administrative fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The order states that Schulte was incarcerated at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and was proceeding without a lawyer.
Court’s order
The court directed Schulte, within 30 days, to do one of two things: pay $402 in fees, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit the attached application and prisoner authorization forms. If the court grants the application to proceed without prepaying fees, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from Schulte’s account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.
No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that, if Schulte complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures, and that, if he failed to comply within the permitted time, the action would be dismissed. The court also stated that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Schulte’s claims.
Additional caution
The order cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), potentially affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future actions. This caution was not itself a finding that Schulte’s claims were frivolous or failed to state a claim.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.