Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 9, 2021

Rios v. Zion Farm LLC

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:19-cv-04363
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Rios v. Zion Farm, Judge Gardephe dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case because Rios failed to prosecute it.

Who this affects

The dismissal ended Ezekiel Rios’s action against the remaining defendants, Zion Farm LLC and Beom Y. Lee; the opinion does not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

In Rios v. Zion Farm LLC, Ezekiel Rios brought a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act on behalf of himself, other workers, and a proposed class. Two defendants were voluntarily dismissed, leaving Zion Farm LLC and Beom Y. Lee in the case.

The case remained inactive for more than a year. After the court ordered Rios to seek a judgment against the remaining defendants or explain why the case should not be dismissed, Rios took no action.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe dismissed the action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk was directed to terminate pending motions and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rios v. Zion Farm LLC · No. 1:19-cv-04363
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
June 9, 2021

Background

Ezekiel Rios filed this Fair Labor Standards Act case on May 14, 2019, on behalf of himself, other collective plaintiffs, and a proposed class. On July 30, 2019, Rios voluntarily dismissed the case as to Mountain Farms, Inc. and Kyu Ok Han. The case continued against Zion Farm LLC and Beom Y. Lee.

The docket had no activity for more than a year. On December 7, 2020, the court ordered Rios to seek a judgment based on the remaining defendants’ failure to respond by December 21, 2020, or explain why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Rios took no action, and the deadline passed without a response.

Court’s Analysis

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) permits a district court to dismiss an action when a plaintiff fails to prosecute it. The court considered five factors: the length of the delay, whether the plaintiff was warned that further delay could result in dismissal, possible prejudice to the defendants, whether the plaintiff received a fair opportunity to be heard, and whether a lesser sanction would be effective.

The court found that all five factors supported dismissal. Rios’s failure to act lasted more than a year, including nearly six months after the court’s warning. The court presumed that further delay would prejudice the defendants. It also concluded that the warning protected Rios’s opportunity to be heard and that lesser sanctions would be ineffective because Rios had not responded to the court’s order.

Disposition

The court dismissed the action for failure to prosecute. The clerk was directed to terminate any pending motions and close the case. The opinion did not decide the underlying Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.