Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 11, 2021

Coxolca Suy v. Excel Food Corp.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:18-cv-12103
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Coxolca Suy v. Excel Food Corp., Judge Failla granted the request to extend the deadline for filing a Rule 68 judgment.

Who this affects

The parties to Coxolca Suy v. Excel Food Corp., who received additional time to file a proposed Rule 68 judgment.

What happened

In Coxolca Suy v. Excel Food Corp., the parties told the court they planned to resolve the case through a Rule 68 offer of judgment. They said they needed additional time to complete the required materials.

The parties jointly asked the court to change the June 14, 2021 deadline for settlement materials into a deadline for submitting the offer and to extend that deadline by three weeks.

The court granted the request and ordered the parties to file the proposed Rule 68 judgment by July 6, 2021. Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued the order on June 11, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Coxolca Suy v. Excel Food Corp. · No. 1:18-cv-12103
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
June 11, 2021

Background

The plaintiff’s attorney informed the court that the parties intended to resolve the case through an offer of judgment under Rule 68. The letter stated that the parties needed additional time to finalize the required materials and submit the offer to the court.

Request

The parties asked the court, on consent, to change the existing June 14, 2021 deadline for submitting settlement materials into a deadline for submitting the Rule 68 offer. They also asked for a three-week extension.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It ordered the parties to file the proposed Rule 68 judgment by July 6, 2021. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or state the terms of any eventual resolution.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.