Barrett v. Rosario
- Gregory Woods
- 1:19-cv-07815
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Barrett v. Rosario, Judge Woods granted defendants’ adjournment request and ordered Chandra K. Barrett to attend the rescheduled conference.
Chandra K. Barrett, defendants Ruben R. Rosario and Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc., and their counsel were affected by the rescheduled status conference and related attendance and courthouse requirements.
What happened
In Barrett v. Rosario, the court granted defendants’ counsel’s request to postpone a June 18, 2021 status conference about the next steps in the case.
The conference was rescheduled for July 15, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. at the Southern District of New York courthouse. The court reminded the parties to follow its rules for adjournment requests and courthouse safety procedures.
Judge Gregory H. Woods ordered Chandra K. Barrett to attend the July 15 conference and directed the clerk to mail her the order by certified mail.
The detailed version
- Barrett v. Rosario · No. 1:19-cv-07815
- Gregory Woods
- June 10, 2021
Background Defendants’ counsel asked to postpone the status conference scheduled for June 18, 2021. The conference was intended to discuss the next steps in the action.
Ruling The court granted the request to adjourn the conference. It rescheduled the conference for July 15, 2021, at 4:00 p.m., in Courtroom 12C of the Southern District of New York courthouse.
The court reminded the parties that they must review and comply with its Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. It specifically noted that requests to postpone conferences must state whether the opposing party agrees and, if not, the reason the opposing party gave for refusing to agree.
Attendance and Courthouse Procedures The court ordered Chandra K. Barrett to attend the July 15 conference. It also described pandemic-related courthouse requirements, including completing a health questionnaire and having one's temperature taken. The clerk was directed to mail a copy of the order to Barrett by certified mail.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.