Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 14, 2021

Todd v. Colombos

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:21-cv-05226
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Todd v. Colombos, Judge Swain ordered Lavelle Todd to pay filing fees or submit prisoner forms within 30 days before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Lavelle Todd, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, was required to pay the stated fees or submit the required prisoner forms within 30 days to continue the action.

What happened

In Todd v. Colombos, Lavelle Todd, who is incarcerated and representing himself, filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Todd 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Todd and certify that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, denying permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Todd v. Colombos · No. 7:21-cv-05226
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
June 14, 2021

Background

Lavelle Todd filed this civil action against A. Colombos, identified in the caption as a correctional officer. The order states that Todd was incarcerated at Clinton Correctional Facility and was proceeding without a lawyer. He submitted his complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. If the court grants that application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the $350 filing fee to be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to make those deductions and provide certified account statements for the previous six months.

The court ordered Todd, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $402 or submit the required application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 21-CV-5226. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail Todd a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s procedures if Todd complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed time.

Other Ruling and Effect

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order addressed filing requirements and the possible consequences of noncompliance; it did not resolve the merits of Todd’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.