Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2021

Schulte v. United States of America

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:21-cv-05313
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro SeFee Petition
In one sentence

In Schulte v. United States of America, Judge Swain ordered payment or fee-waiver paperwork within 30 days or dismissal.

Who this affects

Joshua Adam Schulte, who must either pay the required fees or submit the specified application and prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action.

What happened

In Schulte v. United States of America, Joshua Adam Schulte filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that he was incarcerated and represented himself.

The court gave Schulte 30 days to either pay $402 or submit a signed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow filing-fee payments to be deducted from his prison account in installments. No summons would issue at that time, and failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action.

Judge Swain also ruled that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Schulte v. United States of America · No. 1:21-cv-05313
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
June 16, 2021

Background

Joshua Adam Schulte filed this civil action without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization. The order states that Schulte was incarcerated at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and was representing himself.

Court’s Order

The court explained that a prisoner bringing a civil action must either pay $402 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit the forms required to request permission to proceed without prepayment. If that request is granted, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account. The prisoner authorization also directs the facility to make those deductions and provide certified copies of account statements for the previous six months. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepayment.

The court ordered Schulte, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $402 or submit the completed application and prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 21-CV-5313 (LTS). The Clerk was directed to mail him a copy of the order and record service on the docket. No summons was to issue at that time. The order states that, if Schulte complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office’s procedures; if he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Scope of Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for being frivolous, malicious, or failing to state a claim could count as a strike under the prisoner litigation statute. This order addressed filing fees and required forms; it did not decide the merits of Schulte’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.