Rutledge v. Khiladi LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:20-cv-08710
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rutledge v. Khiladi LLC, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without prejudice to timely restoration.
Korin Rutledge, Khiladi LLC, and Curragh Realty LLC; the case was closed after the parties reported reaching a settlement.
What happened
In Rutledge v. Khiladi LLC, the parties reported that they had reached a settlement. The opinion does not disclose the settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 60 days. The court also closed the case and adjourned the scheduled conference without setting a new date.
Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered that any request to reopen the case be filed within 60 days and explained that the settlement terms would need to be made public and approved by the court if the parties wanted the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement.
The detailed version
- Rutledge v. Khiladi LLC · No. 1:20-cv-08710
- Ronnie Abrams
- June 16, 2021
Background
The court stated that the parties had reported reaching a settlement. The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement terms, or the parties’ positions on the merits.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 60 days. It stated that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 60 days of the order and that a later application could be denied solely because it was late.
The court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction—the authority to oversee enforcement—to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period. The conference scheduled for June 25, 2021, was adjourned without a new date, and the Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Effect
The order ended the action based on the reported settlement, while preserving a 60-day procedure for seeking restoration or reopening. It did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.