Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 18, 2021

Pacific Life Insurance Company v. The Bank of New York Mellon

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:17-cv-01388
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Pacific Life v. Bank of New York Mellon, Judge Lehrburger denied BNYM’s request to keep six exhibits and related filings sealed.

Who this affects

The Bank of New York Mellon’s request to keep specified exhibits and related portions of its filings sealed was denied.

What happened

Pacific Life Insurance Company v. The Bank of New York Mellon concerned The Bank of New York Mellon’s request to keep certain materials sealed while seeking summary judgment.

The Bank of New York Mellon asked the court to maintain sealing over six exhibits and related portions of its summary-judgment memorandum and statement of facts. It cited sensitive business information, third parties’ private financial information, and financial-account information.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger denied the sealing application. He said the excerpts did not meet the strict standards for sealing information in the Second Circuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pacific Life Insurance Company v. The Bank of New York Mellon · No. 1:17-cv-01388
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
June 18, 2021

Background

The Bank of New York Mellon (BNYM) asked the court to keep six exhibits under seal. The exhibits had been filed provisionally under seal in connection with BNYM’s motion for summary judgment. BNYM also sought redactions to related portions of its supporting memorandum and its statement of undisputed material facts.

BNYM argued that some deposition excerpts contained sensitive information about its internal procedures and specific projects. It also argued that another exhibit contained confidential, nonpublic personal information belonging to third parties, including financial-account information. BNYM separately relied on the federal rule concerning the protection of certain financial-account information.

Legal standard and ruling

The court considered the standards governing access to court records in the Second Circuit, including whether the materials were judicial documents, the strength of the presumption of public access, and competing interests that might overcome that presumption. BNYM argued that the documents were not judicial documents because they had played no role in the court’s decision-making functions and had been exchanged during discovery.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger denied the application to maintain the materials under seal. The order states that the court reviewed the excerpts and that they did not satisfy the strict standards for sealing information imposed in the Second Circuit. The order did not separately describe the treatment of each exhibit or each requested redaction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.