Jimenez v. C C Vending, Inc.
- John Koeltl
- 1:21-cv-02688
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Jimenez v. C C Vending, counsel told Judge Koeltl the parties had reached a settlement in principle and requested adjournment of upcoming conferences.
The parties to Jimenez v. C C Vending, Inc. and the scheduled court conferences may be affected. The filing does not identify the settlement terms or show any court ruling.
What happened
In Jimenez v. C C Vending, the plaintiffs’ lawyer reported that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The lawyer said the parties would put the settlement terms in writing and submit the agreement with a request for court approval. The letter did not say that the court had approved the settlement.
Judge John G. Koeltl was asked to postpone upcoming conferences, including the initial conference scheduled for June 30, 2021. The provided text does not show the judge’s response.
The detailed version
- Jimenez v. C C Vending, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-02688
- John Koeltl
- June 28, 2021
Nature of the Filing
The provided text is a letter from plaintiffs’ counsel to the court, not a court opinion or order. It reports that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Settlement Process
Counsel stated that the parties would reduce the settlement terms to writing and later submit the proposed settlement agreement, together with a motion asking the court to approve it under the procedure discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House. The text does not provide the settlement’s terms or state that the court approved it.
Request to Adjourn Conferences
Because of the settlement in principle, counsel asked the court to adjourn all upcoming conferences, including the initial conference scheduled for June 30, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. The provided text does not show whether Judge John G. Koeltl granted or denied that request.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.