Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice
- Denise Cote
- 1:21-cv-03675
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Petroceli v. Department of Justice, Judge Swain required payment or a complete fee-waiver application before the case could proceed.
Domingos Lugao Petroceli and the processing of his civil action; he must either pay the required fees or submit a complete amended fee-waiver application within 30 days.
What happened
In Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice, Domingos Lugao Petroceli asked to file the civil action without paying the required fees and was proceeding without a lawyer. His application did not answer questions about bank accounts, assets, expenses, debts, financial obligations, or people he supports.
The court ordered Petroceli, within 30 days, either to pay $402 or submit a signed, complete amended application disclosing his financial information. The $402 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. The court said the action would be dismissed if he did not comply, but this order did not itself dismiss the action.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying appeal fees. The order directs the Clerk of Court to mail Petroceli a copy and record service on the docket.
The detailed version
- Petroceli v. U.S. Department of Justice · No. 1:21-cv-03675
- Denise Cote
- June 25, 2021
Background
Domingos Lugao Petroceli brought this civil action against the U.S. Department of Justice and other defendants. He asked to proceed without prepaying court fees, a status commonly called proceeding without paying fees in advance. The opinion states that he was proceeding without a lawyer.
Petroceli submitted an application for permission to proceed without prepaying fees. He stated that he was not incarcerated or employed and had received no more than $200 in income during the preceding 12 months. But he left unanswered questions about money in bank accounts, other assets and their values, expenses, debts and other financial obligations, and financial support for other people.
Order
The court stated that it lacked enough information to determine whether Petroceli could pay the filing fees. It ordered him, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay $402 to commence the action, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee; or complete, sign, and submit an amended application that clearly answered every question about his financial status. The amended application was to include docket number 1:21-CV-3675 (LTS). The court also stated that Petroceli might still be required to pay the fees if it determined that he had enough funds.
Disposition
Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Petroceli and record service on the docket. The order stated that the action would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Petroceli complied, and that the court would dismiss the action if he failed to comply within the permitted time. The order did not itself dismiss the action.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.