Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 29, 2021

Gross v. HBO West Coast Programming LLC

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:20-cv-02675
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Gross v. HBO West Coast Programming — Judge Torres denied Gross’s reconsideration motion as untimely and said his arguments were meritless.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Abraham Gross, who represented himself; the order also directed the Clerk of Court to mail him a copy.

What happened

In Gross v. HBO West Coast Programming LLC, Abraham Gross asked the court to reconsider its May 27, 2021 order. He filed that request on June 21, 2021.

The court said the request was filed too late under the rule requiring reconsideration motions to be served within 14 days of the original decision. The court also said that, even if the request had been timely, Gross’s arguments did not meet the required standard.

Judge Torres denied the motion. She directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the order to Gross, who was representing himself.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gross v. HBO West Coast Programming LLC · No. 1:20-cv-02675
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
June 29, 2021

Background

On June 21, 2021, Plaintiff Abraham Gross moved for reconsideration of the Court’s May 27, 2021 order. The opinion does not describe the substance of that earlier order.

Court’s reasoning

The Court denied the motion as untimely. It cited Local Rule 6.3, which requires a motion for reconsideration to be served within 14 days of the Court’s original determination. The Court added that, even if the motion had been timely, Gross’s arguments were meritless and did not satisfy the high standard required for reconsideration.

Disposition

Judge Analisa Torres denied Gross’s motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail a copy of the order to Gross, who was proceeding without a lawyer. The opinion does not state any additional disposition of the underlying case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.