Capak v. Street Execs Management
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:20-cv-11079
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Capak v. Street Execs Management, Judge Ronnie Abrams granted Defendant’s motion, dismissed the complaint with prejudice, and entered judgment for Defendant.
Richard Capak’s complaint was dismissed with prejudice, and Street Execs Management received judgment in its favor.
What happened
Capak v. Street Execs Management concerns a judgment in favor of Street Execs Management. The judgment says the court granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed Richard Capak’s complaint with prejudice.
The court also denied Capak’s request for oral argument. It entered judgment for Street Execs Management and closed the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams is identified as the judge. The judgment says the reasons for granting the motion were stated in a memorandum opinion and order dated June 29, 2021, but that memorandum is not included in the provided text.
The detailed version
- Capak v. Street Execs Management · No. 1:20-cv-11079
- Ronnie Abrams
- June 30, 2021
Disposition
The court entered judgment for Street Execs Management. It granted the defendant’s motion and dismissed Richard Capak’s complaint with prejudice, meaning the complaint cannot be brought again in the same form. The judgment states that the reasons for this decision appear in the court’s memorandum opinion and order dated June 29, 2021; that memorandum is not included in the provided opinion text.
Other Ruling
The court denied Capak’s request for oral argument. It also closed the case.
Classification
This is classified as a procedural order because the provided judgment records the case-ending disposition but does not identify the type of motion or explain whether the court reached the merits of the complaint.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.