Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 29, 2021

Sanchez v. Discount Dance, LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-00960
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Sanchez v. Discount Dance, LLC, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled action without costs and without prejudice to timely restoration.

Who this affects

Christian Sanchez, Discount Dance, LLC, and the other persons described in the caption as similarly situated.

What happened

In Sanchez v. Discount Dance, LLC, the court was told that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

Judge Abrams ordered the action discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was filed within 30 days. The Clerk was directed to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any settlement-enforcement jurisdiction would require the agreement’s terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sanchez v. Discount Dance, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-00960
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 29, 2021

Background

Christian Sanchez brought the action on behalf of himself and others described in the caption as similarly situated. The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement. The order does not provide the settlement’s terms or otherwise describe the claims.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The order stated that an application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The order cited Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015).

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.