Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 2, 2021

Bravo v. Barone Steel Fabricators Inc.

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:20-cv-10244
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Bravo v. Barone Steel Fabricators Inc., Judge Failla ordered the parties to submit their settlement for fairness review and ended pending deadlines.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in the case were required to submit the settlement materials. Terminating pending motions and postponing remaining dates affected the case’s pending proceedings.

What happened

In Bravo v. Barone Steel Fabricators Inc., the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement.

The court directed the parties to file the completed settlement agreement and a joint letter addressing whether the agreement is fair. The filings were due by August 2, 2021, for review under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law.

Judge Failla also directed the Clerk to terminate all pending motions and postponed all remaining dates. The order did not state that the settlement had been approved.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bravo v. Barone Steel Fabricators Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-10244
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
July 2, 2021

Background

On July 1, 2021, the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or the claims’ underlying facts.

Court’s Action

The court instructed the parties to file the completed settlement agreement and a joint letter concerning the agreement’s fairness by August 2, 2021. The court stated that it would review the settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law.

The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions and postponed all remaining dates. Judge Katherine Polk Failla did not state in this order that she had approved the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.