Korovin v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
- Andrew Carter
- 1:21-cv-03294
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Korovin v. Citigroup, Judge Carter granted Korovin more time to pay filing fees or apply to proceed without prepayment.
Eugene Korovin, who must either pay the $402 filing fee or submit an IFP application by July 22, 2021, or the action will be dismissed.
What happened
In Korovin v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., Eugene Korovin filed a civil action without paying the required filing fees or submitting an application to proceed without prepayment. He was representing himself.
The court granted Korovin’s request for more time, giving him until July 22, 2021, to pay $402. Alternatively, he could submit an application asking to proceed without prepaying the fees. No summons would issue at that time.
Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. stated that no further extensions would be granted without good cause. He also ruled that an appeal from the order could not proceed without prepayment of appeal fees because it would not be taken in good faith. If Korovin did not comply, the action would be dismissed.
The detailed version
- Korovin v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-03294
- Andrew Carter
- July 1, 2021
Background
Eugene Korovin brought this action against Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. Korovin was representing himself. To start a civil action in the court, a plaintiff must either pay $402 in filing fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying those fees, commonly called an IFP application.
Korovin filed the complaint without paying the fees or submitting an IFP application. The court had previously granted him an extension through June 30, 2021. In a June 23, 2021 letter, Korovin requested additional time, stating that he could pay by July 22, 2021. The defendant did not oppose the request.
Court’s action
The court granted Korovin’s request for an extension through July 22, 2021. By that date, Korovin had to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit the attached IFP application. If the court granted the application, he would be allowed to proceed without prepaying the filing fees.
The clerk was directed to mail the order to Korovin and record service on the docket. No summons would issue at that time. The order stated that, if Korovin complied, the case would be processed under the clerk’s procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. The court also stated that no further extensions would be granted without good cause.
Appeal-fee ruling and effect
The court certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The order addressed filing-fee requirements and case processing; it did not decide the underlying claims against Citigroup.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.