Puma v. Dream Team Partners, LLC
- Sarah Cave
- 1:19-cv-09824
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Puma v. Dream Team Partners, Judge Cave ordered the parties to submit materials supporting review of their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The parties to the Fair Labor Standards Act case, including German Puma, the putative similarly situated plaintiffs, Dream Team Partners LLC, and Sally Chironis, as well as their attorneys.
What happened
In Puma v. Dream Team Partners, the parties reached a settlement after a May 25, 2021 settlement conference. The case includes claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. They must discuss the claims and defenses, possible damages, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the negotiation process, and other relevant issues. They must also provide information about attorney fees, billing records, costs, and the settlement agreement itself.
Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to file those materials by July 27, 2021. The order required information for settlement review; it did not approve or reject the settlement.
The detailed version
- Puma v. Dream Team Partners, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-09824
- Sarah Cave
- July 6, 2021
Background
German Puma brought this case on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Dream Team Partners LLC and Sally Chironis. The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. After a settlement conference on May 25, 2021, the parties reached a settlement. On June 17, 2021, they consented to have a United States magistrate judge handle the case for all purposes.
Order
Because the case includes Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court required the parties to file a joint letter-motion addressing whether their settlement is fair and reasonable, as required by the court's cited authority. The filing must address the claims and defenses, the defendants' potential monetary exposure and the basis for those calculations, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs' case and defendants' defenses, any reasons for a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount, the litigation and negotiation process, and other relevant issues, including whether a judgment would be collectible after trial.
The parties must also explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach any retainer agreement, and provide information about actual attorney fees and costs, including billing records and cost documentation. A copy of the settlement agreement must accompany the filing.
Deadline and Disposition
Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered the parties to file the joint letter-motion by July 27, 2021. The order directed the submission of settlement materials; it did not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.