Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2021

Rivera v. Gonzalez-Espinoza

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:20-cv-09131
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

Rivera v. Gonzalez-Espinoza: Judge Aaron ordered jurisdictional information and set case-management deadlines.

Who this affects

Eliezer Rivera, Yanier Gonzalez-Espinoza, and M & C Freight, LLC, because the order requires jurisdictional information and sets deadlines for pleadings, discovery, and expert reports.

What happened

Rivera v. Gonzalez-Espinoza involved the defendants’ obligation to establish federal jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship. The court required information about the individual members of M & C Freight, LLC.

The court ordered the defendants to file that information by July 14, 2021, and set deadlines for discovery, amended pleadings, and expert reports. It also required a joint discovery-status letter and stated that extensions could be granted for good cause.

Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order after a telephone conference. The order managed the case and requested information about jurisdiction; it did not decide whether federal jurisdiction exists or resolve the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rivera v. Gonzalez-Espinoza · No. 1:20-cv-09131
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
July 7, 2021

Background

Following a telephone conference with the parties, the court addressed the information needed to evaluate subject-matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship and established a schedule for the case.

Jurisdictional Information

The court ordered Yanier Gonzalez-Espinoza and M & C Freight, LLC to file a letter by July 14, 2021, stating the citizenship of each individual member of M & C Freight, LLC. The order explained that a limited liability company has the citizenship of its members and that the party invoking federal jurisdiction bears the burden of showing that jurisdiction exists. It also cited the requirement that diversity jurisdiction generally be complete, meaning that no plaintiff and defendant may be citizens of the same state. The order did not determine whether jurisdiction exists.

Case Schedule

The parties were ordered to file a joint letter about the status of discovery on October 6,

  1. The deadline for amendments to the pleadings was November 30,
  2. Fact discovery was to be completed by January 7,
  3. Plaintiff’s expert reports were due February 11, 2022; Defendants’ expert reports were due March 11, 2022; and expert discovery was to be completed by April 11,
  4. The order stated that deadline extensions could be granted for good cause.

Ruling

Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered a case-management order requiring the jurisdictional filing and setting these deadlines. The order did not rule on the merits of the parties’ claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.