Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 7, 2021

Ngono v. Owono

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:21-cv-00095
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Ngono v. Owono, Judge Netburn accepted the amended complaint and set service deadlines for several defendants.

Who this affects

Andre Marie Ngono and the defendants identified for service: Kamara Youssouf, Africa Employment Agency, Luckendy Realty, Travsail Agency, Inc., Access Transportation Services, Inc., and Sable Hub, Inc.

What happened

In Ngono v. Owono, the court deemed Andre Marie Ngono’s proposed Second Amended Complaint accepted. Ngono was proceeding without a lawyer.

The court instructed the Clerk to send Ngono service forms for Kamara Youssouf, Africa Employment Agency, Luckendy Realty, Travsail Agency, Inc., Access Transportation Services, Inc., and Sable Hub, Inc. Ngono had 30 days to return the forms or ask for summonses to be sent directly to him. If he did neither, the court said it may dismiss the action as to those defendants.

Judge Sarah Netburn also stated that Ngono was responsible for completing service within 90 days after summonses were issued and for requesting more time if necessary. The order was dated July 7, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ngono v. Owono · No. 1:21-cv-00095
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
July 7, 2021

Background

Andre Marie Ngono filed a proposed Second Amended Complaint and was proceeding without a lawyer. The order states that the proposed complaint was deemed accepted.

Order

To permit Ngono to serve several defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court was instructed to send him one U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, also called a USM-285 form, for each of these defendants: Kamara Youssouf, Africa Employment Agency, Luckendy Realty, Travsail Agency, Inc., Access Transportation Services, Inc., and Sable Hub, Inc.

Ngono was required to complete and return each form within 30 days of the order. After receiving the completed forms, the Clerk was to issue summonses and provide the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. If Ngono did not want to use the Marshals Service, he had to notify the court in writing within 30 days and request that the summonses be issued directly to him.

Service Deadline and Disposition

The court warned that, if Ngono neither returned the forms nor requested summonses within 30 days, it might dismiss the action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to those defendants. The order also stated that Ngono was responsible for ensuring service within 90 days after the summons was issued and for requesting an extension of time if needed. Judge Sarah Netburn entered the order on July 7, 2021.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.