Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 9, 2021

In Re: Ahmed Husain Zubair

Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Docket
7:20-cv-08829
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Re: Ahmed Husain Zubair: Judge Briccetti ordered responses to an emergency request but did not decide whether to grant a stay.

Who this affects

Ahmed Husain Zubair; the appellees in the two bankruptcy appeals; and the nonparties named in or discussed in the emergency motion, including AmeriCredit Financial Services.

What happened

In In Re: Ahmed Husain Zubair, Ahmed Husain Zubair, representing himself and unable to pay filing fees, asked for emergency protection while appealing bankruptcy-related matters. He said AmeriCredit Financial Services threatened to repossess his car and sought to stop that repossession and the sale of property.

The court noted that AmeriCredit, Bank of America, N.A., SN Servicing Corp., and US Bank Trust National Association were not parties to either appeal. The court ordered the appellees to respond by July 16, 2021, but only to the extent the motion requested relief against a party to either appeal.

Judge Vincent L. Briccetti did not grant or deny the requested stay in this order. He also denied payment-free status for any appeal from the order after certifying that such an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Ahmed Husain Zubair · No. 7:20-cv-08829
Judge
Vincent Briccetti
Date
July 9, 2021

Background

Ahmed Husain Zubair, the appellant in two bankruptcy appeals, filed an emergency motion for a stay pending appeal and for a temporary stay while the court considered his motion concerning an order dismissing bankruptcy. He was proceeding without a lawyer and without paying filing fees. He stated that AmeriCredit Financial Services, doing business as GM Financial, had threatened to repossess his car. He also alleged that AmeriCredit had violated agreements by rescinding a monthly-payment contract in response to his bankruptcy filing. The motion sought to stop the repossession of his car and the liquidation or sale of his property at 90 Bruce Ave., Yonkers.

Parties and Scope of the Motion

The court noted that AmeriCredit was not a party to either appeal. It also noted that the motion named Fay Servicing, LLC, Bank of America, N.A., SN Servicing Corp., and US Bank Trust National Association as defendants, but that Bank of America, SN Servicing, and US Bank Trust were not parties to either appeal. The court therefore limited the possible relief in this order to requests against parties to the bankruptcy appeals.

Ruling

The court ordered the appellees to respond by July 16, 2021, to the extent the motion could be understood as requesting relief against a party in the appeals. The order did not grant or deny the requested emergency stay. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), Judge Vincent L. Briccetti certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied payment-free status for purposes of such an appeal. The court also directed its chambers to mail a copy of the order to Zubair.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.