Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 17, 2021

Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. v. Parallel Bar Inc.

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:19-cv-07112
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Intellectual PropertyCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

Sid Avery and Associates v. Parallel Bar: Judge Broderick granted $750 in copyright damages plus $4,714.75 in fees and costs after defendants defaulted.

Who this affects

Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. received $750 in statutory damages and $4,714.75 in attorney’s fees and costs from Parallel Bar Inc., Hamid Rashidzada, and Greg Seider after the court’s default judgment and damages ruling.

What happened

Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. sued Parallel Bar Inc., Hamid Rashidzada, and Greg Seider over the unauthorized display of its copyrighted photograph, “Ocean’s Eleven Cast,” on their website. The court had already entered default judgment after the defendants failed to appear or respond.

The plaintiff later requested statutory damages and attorney’s fees and costs. A magistrate judge recommended awarding $750 in statutory damages and $4,714.75 in reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Neither side objected to that recommendation.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed the recommendation for clear error, found none, and adopted it in full. He granted the plaintiff’s motion for damages, directed entry of judgment, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. v. Parallel Bar Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-07112
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
July 17, 2021

Background

Sid Avery and Associates, Inc., doing business as MPTV Images, brought a copyright-infringement action against Parallel Bar Inc., doing business as The Summit Bar, Hamid Rashidzada, and Greg Seider. The claim concerned the defendants’ unauthorized display on their website of the plaintiff’s copyrighted photograph, “Ocean’s Eleven Cast.”

On April 28, 2020, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion for default judgment after the defendants failed to appear or respond to the complaint. The court then referred the case to Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox for an inquest to determine damages and attorney’s fees. The plaintiff requested $87,500 in statutory damages, or at least $30,000, along with $4,714.75 in fees and costs.

Report and Recommendation

The plaintiff served its damages submissions, but the defendants did not oppose them or request more time. On February 2, 2021, Judge Fox recommended granting the plaintiff’s damages motion and awarding $750 in statutory damages and $4,714.75 in reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. Without objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s findings or reasoning.

Ruling

Judge Vernon S. Broderick found no clear error and adopted Judge Fox’s report and recommendation in its entirety. The court’s order states that the plaintiff’s motion for damages was GRANTED. It awarded the plaintiff $750 in statutory damages and $4,714.75 in reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.

The court directed the Clerk’s Office to terminate the damages motion, enter judgment, and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.