Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 16, 2021

Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund v. Krefab…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund v. Krefab Corporation

Judge
Victor Marrero
Docket
1:21-cv-02520
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentFee Petition
In one sentence

In Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund v. Krefab, Judge Marrero confirmed an unopposed arbitration award and awarded fees and costs.

Who this affects

The petitioners received confirmation of the arbitration award and awards of costs, attorney’s fees, and interest; Krefab Corporation was ordered to pay the specified amounts.

What happened

Trustees of the New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund and the other petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award against Krefab Corporation. Krefab did not oppose the petition.

The court treated the unopposed petition as a request for summary judgment. It explained that courts generally must confirm an arbitration award when the arbitrator acted within the authority granted by the agreement, even if the court might think the arbitrator made a mistake. After reviewing the petition and supporting materials, the court found that the arbitrator acted within that authority.

Judge Victor Marrero granted the petition. The order awarded the petitioners $181,158.84, including interest under the award through the date of judgment, $75 in court costs and service fees, $807.50 in attorney’s fees, and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. The clerk was directed to dismiss pending motions and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City Carpenters Relief and Charity Fund v. Krefab… · No. 1:21-cv-02520
Judge
Victor Marrero
Date
Aug. 16, 2021

Background

The petitioners—the trustees of several funds, the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York, and the New York City District Council of Carpenters—brought the action against Krefab Corporation to confirm an arbitration award. The petition was unopposed.

Court’s analysis

The court treated the unopposed petition as a motion for summary judgment, which asks whether the moving party is entitled to judgment based on the record without a trial. The court explained that an arbitration award generally must be confirmed if the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator’s authority and the award was based on the parties’ agreement. A court may not overturn the award merely because it believes the arbitrator was wrong.

After reviewing the petition, memorandum of law, and supporting documents, the court was persuaded that the arbitrator acted within the scope of the arbitrator’s authority. The court also found the petitioners’ requests for attorney’s fees, costs, and post-judgment interest warranted. It found the petitioners’ described attorney-fee rate reasonable.

Order

The court granted the petition. The order awarded the petitioners:

- $181,158.84 against Krefab Corporation, representing the arbitration award plus interest from the award date through the judgment date at an annual rate of 5.25 percent under the award; - $75 in court costs and service fees; - $807.50 in attorney’s fees; and - post-judgment interest at the statutory rate.

The clerk was directed to dismiss all pending motions and close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.