Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 25, 2021

Graham v. Prince

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:15-cv-10160
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Intellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Graham v. Prince, Judge Stein ordered supplemental briefing on recent copyright decisions before ruling on defendants’ pending summary-judgment motions.

Who this affects

The defendants had to file supplemental memoranda by September 15, 2021, and the plaintiffs could file responses by September 22, 2021, in the two related copyright actions.

What happened

Graham v. Prince and the related McNatt v. Prince cases are copyright actions involving Richard Prince and other defendants. The opinion does not describe the underlying copyright disputes in detail.

The court ordered defendants to file memoranda of no more than 25 pages by September 15, 2021, addressing how two recent decisions affected their pending motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs could file responses of no more than 25 pages by September 22, 2021. The order did not decide those motions or the copyright claims.

Judge Sidney H. Stein issued the order on August 25, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Graham v. Prince · No. 1:15-cv-10160
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
Aug. 25, 2021

Background

The court identified Graham v. Prince and McNatt v. Prince as related copyright actions. Defendants had pending motions for summary judgment, which are motions asking the court to decide claims without a trial when the relevant facts are not genuinely disputed. The order does not state the specific copyright issues raised in those motions.

Order

The court ordered defendants to file supplemental memoranda of no more than 25 pages by September 15, 2021. The memoranda had to address the effect of Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 141 S. Ct. 1183 (2021), and Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 992 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2021), as amended on August 24, 2021, on the pending summary-judgment motions. Plaintiffs were permitted to file responsive memoranda of no more than 25 pages by September 22, 2021.

Disposition

The order required additional briefing; it did not grant or deny the pending summary-judgment motions and did not resolve the copyright claims. Judge Sidney H. Stein issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.