Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 27, 2021

Fonz, Inc. v. City Bakery Brands, LLC

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:19-cv-10854-LJL-RWL
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
18
ContractCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Fonz, Inc. v. City Bakery Brands, LLC, Judge Liman’s court recommended awarding Fonz $1,297,509.54 plus interest, fees, and costs after defendants defaulted on secured loans.

Who this affects

Fonz, Inc. was the proposed award recipient. City Bakery Brands, LLC, The City Bakery, LLC, and Maurybakes, LLC were the defendants found liable for the unpaid note, guaranty obligations, and related collateral claims. Maury Rubin was separately dismissed after a bankruptcy-related stay.

What happened

Fonz, Inc. sued City Bakery Brands, LLC, The City Bakery, LLC, and Maurybakes, LLC over unpaid secured loans. The loans were documented through promissory notes, guarantees, and security agreements, and the defendants did not repay the consolidated note.

The court had already granted default judgment after the defendants failed to respond or appear. It then referred the case to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger for a damages review based on written submissions. No defendant responded to Fonz’s damages materials, and the court determined that a hearing was unnecessary.

Magistrate Judge Lehrburger recommended that Judge Liman award Fonz $1,297,509.54 in principal and accrued interest, 9% prejudgment interest, $27,640.50 in attorneys’ fees, and $1,075 in costs. The recommendation also found liability for breach of contract, breach of guaranty, and foreclosure of personal property, but the opinion states that the parties had fourteen days to object.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fonz, Inc. v. City Bakery Brands, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-10854-LJL-RWL
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
Sept. 27, 2021

Background

Fonz, Inc. brought a breach-of-contract case concerning unpaid secured loans. The opinion states that Fonz is a joint-stock company organized under Japanese law and operates and manages City Bakery-branded restaurants in Japan. City Bakery Brands, LLC, The City Bakery, LLC, and Maurybakes, LLC operated a retail café and bakery and provided catering and wholesale services until operations ceased in 2019.

Fonz first loaned $200,000 to The City Bakery, LLC in July

  1. It later provided additional funding totaling $350,000 and then extended another $540,000 loan in November
  2. After the parties negotiated an extension, they entered a consolidated promissory note on February 27,
  3. City Bakery Brands issued the note for $1,167,175, with a maturity date of June 13,
  4. The related guaranty was made by The City Bakery, Maurybakes, and Maury Rubin. Security agreements gave Fonz interests in most of the relevant companies’ assets, subject to stated exceptions.

The defendants did not repay the note. Fonz sent default notices and demanded payment and turnover of collateral. Fonz offered to accept the collateral in full satisfaction of the debt, but the defendants rejected that offer. The opinion states that $1,167,175 in principal and $130,334.54 in accrued interest remained unpaid. Maury Rubin later filed for bankruptcy, the action was stayed as to him, and he was voluntarily dismissed.

Procedural history

Fonz filed the action on November 22, 2019. After the defendants failed to respond to the complaint and failed to appear at scheduled conferences, Judge Lewis J. Liman directed Fonz to seek default judgment. Fonz filed that motion, and Judge Liman granted it on January 21, 2021. On July 7, 2021, Judge Liman referred the case to Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger for an inquest—the court’s review of the amount of damages owed after default judgment.

Fonz submitted proposed findings, declarations, agreements, billing records, and receipts. The defendants did not respond. Magistrate Judge Lehrburger determined that the damages could be calculated from the written submissions and that no hearing was needed.

Liability

Because the defendants defaulted, the court treated the complaint’s well-pleaded factual allegations about liability as true, while requiring Fonz to prove the amount of damages. The court found a legal basis for liability on three types of claims.

First, the court found liability for breach of contract. The loan documents established contracts, Fonz had performed by providing the loans, the defendants failed to repay the note, and Fonz suffered the resulting financial loss. Second, the court found liability for breach of guaranty because the underlying debt existed, the guaranty was unconditional, and The City Bakery and Maurybakes failed to perform their guaranty obligations. Third, the court found that Fonz had the right to foreclose on the collateral under the security agreements and New York’s secured-transactions law because City Bakery Brands failed to pay.

Damages and other relief

The court recommended $1,167,175 in unpaid principal. It also recommended $130,334.54 in interest calculated at the note’s 15% annual rate from February 27, 2019, through November 22, 2019. Together, those amounts totaled $1,297,509.54.

The court further recommended prejudgment interest at New York’s statutory rate of 9%, to be calculated by the Clerk of Court. The court used that rate because Fonz requested it, although the opinion noted that some authority could support using the higher contractual rate of 15% until payment or entry of judgment.

The court recommended $27,640.50 in attorneys’ fees because the note allowed recovery of reasonable enforcement expenses and fees. It found the attorneys’ hourly rates and the approximately 65 attorney hours and 8 paralegal hours reasonable. It also recommended $1,075 in costs for filing, service of process, and other court-related expenses.

Recommendation and objections

Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger recommended that the district court award Fonz the principal and accrued interest, 9% prejudgment interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The opinion states that the parties had fourteen days to file written objections with the Clerk of Court. The provided opinion is a report and recommendation and does not state whether Judge Liman later adopted it.

The authoritative version

Read the full 18-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.