Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 29, 2021

In Re: Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Word of Faith Ministries, Inc.

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:21-cv-02326
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
BankruptcyCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Brown v. Piazza, Judge Nathan reopened Brown’s bankruptcy appeal, accepted her late filing as excusable neglect, and set deadlines for continuing it.

Who this affects

Jeanette Y. Brown, whose appeal from a bankruptcy order was reopened subject to filing and briefing deadlines; Deborah J. Piazza, the appellee, whose response deadline was set.

What happened

In Jeanette Y. Brown v. Deborah J. Piazza, the court considered Brown’s request to reopen her appeal from a bankruptcy order. The court had dismissed the appeal because Brown did not timely pay the filing fee or file the required list of record items and statement of issues.

Brown later paid the fee after learning about the dismissal and told the court she intended to continue the appeal. Piazza did not respond. Brown also remained subject to limits on the issues she could raise.

Judge Alison J. Nathan reopened the appeal and accepted Brown’s late filing of the required documents because her failure resulted from excusable neglect. The court ordered Brown to file those documents by November 19, 2021, and set briefing deadlines, stating that the appeal could proceed if she met that deadline.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Word of Faith Ministries, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-02326
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Oct. 29, 2021

Background

Jeanette Y. Brown appealed an order from a bankruptcy case. On July 16, 2021, the court dismissed the appeal because Brown had not timely paid the filing fee required by federal law and had not timely filed the designation of items to be included in the appellate record and the statement of issues required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009.

Brown later asked the court to reopen the appeal. The court noted that she paid the filing fee soon after learning that the appeal had been dismissed. It asked Deborah J. Piazza whether she opposed reopening and asked Brown to confirm whether she intended to continue the appeal despite limits on the issues she could present. Piazza did not respond, and Brown timely submitted a letter stating that she intended to proceed.

Ruling

The court exercised its discretion to reopen Brown’s appeal. It described dismissal as a harsh sanction and concluded that dismissal was not warranted because Brown, who was representing herself, had acted diligently and in good faith, and Piazza had not shown prejudice.

The court also exercised its discretion to accept a late filing under Rule 8009 because Brown’s failure to comply resulted from excusable neglect. The court ordered Brown to file a designation of the record items and a statement of the issues by November 19, 2021. If she complied with that deadline, the appeal could proceed. The court set December 17, 2021, for Brown’s opening brief, January 14, 2022, for Piazza’s response, and January 28, 2022, for Brown’s reply. It also reminded Brown that she could raise only the issues identified in the court’s earlier orders.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.