Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Nov. 2, 2021

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Genrus Corp.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:21-cv-02090
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
8
ErisaContractArbitrationSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Trustees v. Genrus Corp., Judge Ramos confirmed an unchallenged arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners obtained a court judgment confirming the arbitration award. Genrus Corp. was ordered to pay $21,250.50, specified interest, $1,610 in attorneys’ fees, and $75 in costs.

What happened

The case, Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, et al. v. Genrus Corp., involved a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The award concerned Genrus’s unpaid contributions and other amounts allegedly owed under collective bargaining agreements and project labor agreements.

Genrus did not appear at the final arbitration hearing and did not respond to the petition in court. The court treated the unanswered petition as an unopposed request for summary judgment, but still reviewed the record to determine whether the petitioners were legally entitled to judgment.

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the petition and confirmed the arbitration award. The court directed entry of judgment for $21,250.50, plus 5.25% annual interest through the judgment date, and ordered Genrus to pay $1,610 in attorneys’ fees and $75 in costs related to the petition. The judgment also accrues post-judgment interest.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:21-cv-02090
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Nov. 2, 2021

Background

The petitioners included trustees of employee-benefit funds governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, trustees of a charitable fund, the Carpenter Contractor Alliance of Metropolitan New York, and the New York City District Council of Carpenters. Genrus was bound by project labor agreements and collective bargaining agreements with the Union. Those agreements required Genrus to make contributions to the funds for covered employee work and to provide books and payroll records for audits. They also required arbitration of disputes over unpaid contributions.

An audit covering January 1, 2017, through March 24, 2019, found that Genrus had not made all required contributions. The petitioners started arbitration and gave Genrus notice of the proceedings. At the first hearing, the parties reached a tentative agreement under which Genrus would pay $12,791.15 by the next hearing; otherwise, the original claim of $21,250.50 would be awarded. Genrus did not appear at the December 3, 2020, hearing. The arbitrator found that Genrus had received legally sufficient notice, considered the petitioners’ evidence and audit report, and issued a December 5, 2020, award ordering Genrus to pay $21,250.50. The award included unpaid contributions and other amounts, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and arbitration costs, less a prior payment. It also provided for 5.25% interest from the award date.

Court’s Analysis

The petitioners asked the court to confirm the arbitration award. Genrus was served with the petition but did not respond within 21 days, so the petition was treated as unopposed. The court explained that an unanswered petition to confirm an arbitration award is treated as an unopposed motion for summary judgment, meaning the court must still examine the record and determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The court found sufficient support for the award. The arbitrator had heard testimony, reviewed the collective bargaining agreements and the petitioners’ submissions, and considered the audit report. The court concluded that the evidence showed Genrus owed contributions and interest under the agreements. It found no indication that the arbitrator acted arbitrarily, exceeded the arbitrator’s authority, or acted contrary to law. The court also found the attorneys’ fees and costs in the award appropriate because Genrus had neither complied with nor sought to modify or vacate the award.

Ruling

Judge Edgardo Ramos granted the petition and confirmed the arbitration award. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment for the petitioners against Genrus in the amount of $21,250.50, plus 5.25% annual interest from December 5, 2020, through the judgment date. Genrus was also ordered to pay $1,610 in attorneys’ fees and $75 in costs arising from the petition. The judgment accrues post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961, and the case was closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 8-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.