Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2021

Wade v. Melecio

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:21-cv-09138
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Wade v. Melecio, Chief Judge Swain ordered Darius Wade to pay the fee or request fee-free status, warning the case would be dismissed otherwise.

Who this affects

Darius Wade, who was required to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees within 30 days; the case could be dismissed if he did not comply.

What happened

In Wade v. Melecio, Darius Wade filed a petition asking for habeas relief while representing himself. He did not pay the required $5 filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it in advance.

The court gave Wade 30 days to pay the fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court said no response from the respondent was required yet and warned that the case would be dismissed if Wade did not comply.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order. She also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, finding that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wade v. Melecio · No. 1:21-cv-09138
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Nov. 4, 2021

Background

Darius Wade, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The opinion does not address the substance of his habeas claims. Wade submitted the petition without paying the $5 filing fee and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Order

The court directed Wade, within 30 days of the order, to do one of two things: pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees. The application was to identify docket number 21-CV-9138 (LTS). The court explained that, if the application were granted, Wade could proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Wade and record service on the docket. No answer from the respondent was required at that stage. The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk's Office procedures if Wade complied, but that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed period.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This was an administrative filing-fee order; it did not decide whether Wade was entitled to habeas relief.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.